AT2k Design BBS Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages!

You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges.

Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Slashdot  <--  <--- Return to Home Page
   Local Database  Slashdot   [234 / 237] RSS
 From   To   Subject   Date/Time 
Message   VRSS    All   Vibe Coding Has Turned Senior Devs Into 'AI Babysitters'   September 15, 2025
 6:40 PM  

Feed: Slashdot
Feed Link: https://slashdot.org/
---

Title: Vibe Coding Has Turned Senior Devs Into 'AI Babysitters'

Link: https://developers.slashdot.org/story/25/09/1...

An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch: Carla Rover once spent
30 minutes sobbing after having to restart a project she vibe coded. Rover
has been in the industry for 15 years, mainly working as a web developer.
She's now building a startup, alongside her son, that creates custom machine
learning models for marketplaces. She called vibe coding a beautiful, endless
cocktail napkin on which one can perpetually sketch ideas. But dealing with
AI-generated code that one hopes to use in production can be "worse than
babysitting," she said, as these AI models can mess up work in ways that are
hard to predict. She had turned to AI coding in a need for speed with her
startup, as is the promise of AI tools. "Because I needed to be quick and
impressive, I took a shortcut and did not scan those files after the
automated review," she said. "When I did do it manually, I found so much
wrong. When I used a third-party tool, I found more. And I learned my
lesson." She and her son wound up restarting their whole project -- hence the
tears. "I handed it off like the copilot was an employee," she said. "It
isn't." Rover is like many experienced programmers turning to AI for coding
help. But such programmers are also finding themselves acting like AI
babysitters -- rewriting and fact-checking the code the AI spits out. A
recent report by content delivery platform company Fastly found that at least
95% of the nearly 800 developers it surveyed said they spend extra time
fixing AI-generated code, with the load of such verification falling most
heavily on the shoulders of senior developers. These experienced coders have
discovered issues with AI-generated code ranging from hallucinating package
names to deleting important information and security risks. Left unchecked,
AI code can leave a product far more buggy than what humans would produce.
Working with AI-generated code has become such a problem that it's given rise
to a new corporate coding job known as "vibe code cleanup specialist."
TechCrunch spoke to experienced coders about their time using AI-generated
code about what they see as the future of vibe coding. Thoughts varied, but
one thing remained certain: The technology still has a long way to go. "Using
a coding co-pilot is kind of like giving a coffee pot to a smart six-year-old
and saying, 'Please take this into the dining room and pour coffee for the
family,'" Rover said. Can they do it? Possibly. Could they fail? Definitely.
And most likely, if they do fail, they aren't going to tell you. "It doesn't
make the kid less clever," she continued. "It just means you can't delegate
[a task] like that completely." Further reading: The Software Engineers Paid
To Fix Vibe Coded Messes

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

---
VRSS v2.1.180528
  Show ANSI Codes | Hide BBCodes | Show Color Codes | Hide Encoding | Hide HTML Tags | Show Routing
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Slashdot  <--  <--- Return to Home Page

VADV-PHP
Execution Time: 0.0139 seconds

If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster.
VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2025 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved.
Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf.
v2.1.250224