Feed: Slashdot
Feed Link: https://slashdot.org/
---

Title: Does the World Need Publicly-Owned Social Networks?

Link: https://yro.slashdot.org/story/25/05/25/17520...

"Do we need publicly-owned social networks to escape Silicon Valley?" asks an
opinion piece in Spain's El Pais newspaper. It argues it's necessary because
social media platforms "have consolidated themselves as quasi-monopolies,
with a business model that consists of violating our privacy in search of
data to sell ads..." Among the proposals and alternatives to these platforms,
the idea of public social media networks has often been mentioned. Imagine,
for example, a Twitter for the European Union, or a Facebook managed by media
outlets like the BBC. In February, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro S�nchez
called for "the development of our own browsers, European public and private
social networks and messaging services that use transparent protocols."
Former Spanish prime minister Jose Luis Rodr�guez Zapatero - who governed
from 2004 until 2011 - and the left-wing Sumar bloc in the Spanish Parliament
have also proposed this. And, back in 2021, former British Labour Party
leader Jeremy Corbyn made a similar suggestion. At first glance, this may
seem like a good idea: a public platform wouldn't require algorithms - which
are designed to stimulate addiction and confrontation - nor would it have to
collect private information to sell ads. Such a platform could even
facilitate public conversations, as pointed out by James Muldoon, a professor
at Essex Business School and author of Platform Socialism: How to Reclaim our
Digital Future from Big Tech (2022)... This could be an alternative that
would contribute to platform pluralism and ensure we're not dependent on a
handful of billionaires. This is especially important at a time when we're
increasingly aware that technology isn't neutral and that private platforms
respond to both economic and political interests. There's other
possibilities. Further down they write that "it makes much more sense for the
state to invest in, or collaborate with, decentralized social media networks
based on free and interoperable software" that "allow for the portability of
information and content." They even spoke to Cory Doctorow, who they say
"proposes that the state cooperate with the software systems, developers, or
servers for existing open-source platforms, such as the U.S. network Bluesky
or the German firm Mastodon." (Doctorow adds that reclaiming digital
independence "is incredibly important, it's incredibly difficult, and it's
incredibly urgent." The article also acknowledges the option of "legislative
initiatives - such as antitrust laws, or even stricter regulations than those
imposed in Europe - that limit or prevent surveillance capitalism." (Though
they also figures showing U.S. tech giants have one of the largest lobbying
groups in the EU, with Meta being the top spender...)

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

---
VRSS v2.1.180528