[ The Biden administration knows no bounds to its stupidity. ]

From: https://shorturl.at/c8PD5 (westernjournal.com)

===
Biden Orders Gov't Org Responsible for Weather Forecasts to Use 'Special' 
Indian
                                   Knowledge

   By C. Douglas Golden
   December 15, 2024 at 9:00am

   "The mission of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
   is to provide daily weather forecasts, severe storm warnings, climate
   monitoring to fisheries management, coastal restoration, and the
   supporting of marine commerce."

   That's a pretty straightforward mission. In fact, it's right there on the
   homepage of the NOAA on the U.S. Department of Commerce's website, which
   administers the weather forecasting service. Its job should be dry,
   scientific and factual in nature.

   But, leave it to the outgoing administration of President Joe Biden to
   decide that the folks in charge of tracking storms and forecasting whether
   it'll rain or snow needed a bit of "Indigenous Knowledge" injected into
   it.

   According to a Tuesday report from the Washington Free Beacon, the effort
   is what writer Joseph Simonson described "as part of a last-minute push in
   the federal government to embrace what scientists call pseudoscience.

   "NOAA is excited to team up with the American Indian Higher Education
   Consortium to accelerate information-sharing aimed at building climate
   resilience, adaptation and co-production of knowledge in communities
   across the United States and tribal nations," said NOAA Administrator Rick
   Spinrad in a media release.

   "Indigenous Knowledge has made it possible for Indigenous Nations to
   persist and thrive for millennia. These knowledge systems are needed more
   than ever to inform NOAA and our nation's approach to environmental
   stewardship."

   "The American Indian Higher Education Consortium is honored to partner
   with NOAA to collaborate on shared goals and issues," said Ahniwake Rose,
   AIHEC president and CEO.

   "This collaboration will create opportunities for our faculty and
   students, combine Indigenous Knowledge with western science to achieve
   strong climate resilience for our tribal nations and across the country
   and empower our tribal colleges and universities to be leaders in the
   ongoing response to climate change."

   Now, most of these NOAA/AIHEC agenda items are vague box-checking items
   that sound a whole lot like gobbledygook that looks good on a website.
   Talk of how the agreement would "empower our tribal colleges and
   universities to be leaders in the ongoing response to climate change" is
   basically woke lorem ipsum stuff for these kinds of media releases.

   Is "indigenous knowledge" simply another way for the left to eat away at
   Western culture?

   However, there were a few phrases in there that, if you paid close
   attention in between the wokespeak, didn't exactly augur well for how this
   will impact the NOAA.

   For instance, the release talks about how the agreement would "advance
   Indigenous Knowledge, science, technology, education and workforce
   training opportunities." One of the bullet points of how this would have
   an affect is in "dentifying western science and Indigenous Knowledge
   priorities for the AIHEC."

   That may sound vague enough, but it's not.

   "`Indigenous Knowledge' is a discredited belief system posting that
   native-born peoples possess an innate understanding of how the universe
   works," Simonson noted in his piece.

   "While scientists have referred to its ideas as `dangerous' and a
   rejection of the scientific method, those criticisms have not stopped the
   Biden administration from ordering the federal government to consider
   `Indigenous Knowledge' when implementing rules and regulations.

   "President Joe Biden issued a memo in November 2022 that directed more
   than two dozen federal agencies to apply `Indigenous Knowledge' to
   `decision making, research, and policies,'" Simonson continued. "The memo
   called on agencies to speak with `spiritual leaders' and reject
   `methodological dogma.'"

   Considering that forecasting whether it's going to rain cats and dogs or
   whether the sun will shine brightly requires a whole lot of
   "methodological dogma," that is indeed an issue.

   And what "Indigenous Knowledge" are we going to consider at the NOAA?
   Because, the Partnership With Native Americans noted in a 2017 article,
   the rain dance is still a thing among many indigenous American Indian
   tribes.

   "As a Lakota, I always found it stereotypical when asked about the rain
   dance. In all my life, I had never heard of any rain dance taught in
   Lakota culture. Why? Because, we don't practice it. The assumption of the
   practice still persists, however, and it's worth investigating where this
   idea originated," the writer noted.

   "It was only recently, for instance, that I learned the rain dance is
   actually a fairly common practice among southern tribes. These tribes
   typically reside in dry climates, where water is essential to life, making
   it something of a cornerstone in those cultures. Rain, specifically water,
   is important to sustaining life for all communities, but for some this
   precious resource is scarce."

   "One of the tribes that practices the rain dance still today is the
   Ohlone, located in a small town in the southern central part of
   California. And in a small town, it is said, `when you call a rain dance,
   word gets around.' In Ohlone culture, the dance is greatly respected, with
   pure intent and high significance. After a three-year drought, they
   attributed the returning rain to their dances."

   Will the NOAA be holding discussions with the Ohlone? After all, this is
   part of the body of "Indigenous Knowledge," which encompasses a wide
   variety of cultures and traditions we lump under the aegis of "Native
   American." Who's to say that tribes which place a strong emphasis on
   traditions that use rain dances or whose views on the environment are
   entwined with animism, say, have believes that are less valid than the
   Lakota, who don't practice those things?

   I mean, aside from the fact that it's entirely unscientific - but then
   again, "Indigenous Knowledge," if scientific, is simply "knowledge."
   Western culture managed to figure that out on its own, in fact. That means
   there's no need for any sort of partnership - unless, of course, the whole
   idea is to eat away at Western culture.

   So is this just woke posturing, or are we going to see Jim Cantore
   consulting an Ohlone elder/NOAA surrogate on the Weather Channel the next
   time a hurricane makes landfall?

   Enquiring minds want to know - but either way, it's a fitting manner for
   this wretched administration to go out on.
===

-- Sean

... War never decides who is right, only who is left.
--- MultiMail/Linux
 * Origin: Outpost BBS * Johnson City, TN (618:618/1)