AT2k Design BBS Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages!

You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges.

Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Friendly Debate (18+ please)  <--  <--- Return to Home Page
   Networked Database  Friendly Debate (18+ please)   [1947 / 1996] RSS
 From   To   Subject   Date/Time 
Message   August Abolins    Arelor   US government says compan   January 5, 2025
 12:52 PM *  

Hello Arelor!

 A> These sort of rules exist in order to dogpile charges.

 A> Say there is some guy you dislike who sells unlicensed
 A> icecreams. You open an investigation and start digging up
 A> dirt. It turns out his icecream refrigerator was built
 A> using old (outdated) regulations and in addition he has an
 A> account with a dropbox-like provider from a banned country,
 A> where he uploads his billing and accounting docs. Suddenly
 A> you have soooo much more material to jail this guy, for
 A> soooo much longer than just selling icecreams without a
 A> local license.

BUT.. the summary of the DOJ rule seems to *allow* business  
with those countries:

"It also doesn't broadly prohibit US citizens from "engaging in
commercial transactions, including exchanging financial and
other data as part of the sale of commercial goods and services
with countries of concern or covered persons, or impose
measures aimed at a broader decoupling of the substantial
consumer, economic, scientific, and trade relationships that
the United States has with other countries."

So.. that sounds like "business" wrt goods is OK.

It seems that the issue is primarily about the reselling of  
personal/private/identification data only:

"Once the rule is implemented, Americans' personal data will no  
longer be "permitted to be sold to hostile foreign powers,  
whether through outright purchase or other means of commercial  
access," Olsen added."

And then there is the "exception".   :|  Probably to exclude  
the "scientific" goings on in places like Wuhan:

"There are a few exemptions. It doesn't prohibit Americans
"from conducting medical, scientific, or other research in
countries of concern, or from partnering or collaborating with
covered persons to share data to conduct researching, if that
activity does not involve the exchange of payment or other
consideration as part of a covered data transaction."

My quoted paragraphs come from:

https://www.pcmag.com/news/new-doj-rule-block... 
citizens-data-to-countries-of-concern

-- 
  ../|ug

--- OpenXP 5.0.58
 * Origin: (} Pointy McPointface (618:250/1.9)
  Show ANSI Codes | Hide BBCodes | Show Color Codes | Hide Encoding | Hide HTML Tags | Show Routing
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Friendly Debate (18+ please)  <--  <--- Return to Home Page

VADV-PHP
Execution Time: 0.0162 seconds

If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster.
VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2025 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved.
Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf.
v2.1.250224