AT2k Design BBS Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages! You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges. |
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Friendly Debate (18+ please) <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
|
||||||
From | To | Subject | Date/Time | |||
![]() |
Andrew Leary | August Abolins | Fidonet |
February 24, 2025 12:21 AM * |
||
Hello August! 23 Feb 25 14:55, you wrote to digimaus: d>> The current bullshittery in FTSC_PUBLIC is proof that d>> Fidonet is starting its death spiral. [...] AA> The ftsc voting thing is a bit over-rated, and too serious. The basic problem is that too many people see the FTSC as a political organization/group. It is not, and was never intended to be. It is supposed to be a purely technical group which documents how FidoNet works, and the information that software developers need to create working FidoNet compatible software. There is no advantage to any particular zone or region in having representation on the FTSC. If the current slate of candidates are elected, we will have 3 members from Zone 1, and 1 each from Zones 2 and 3. AA> The documentation system called ftsc is not in itself a bad AA> thing, but some of the debate between what is a standard and is AA> not, and whether an established standard is MUST or a SHALL or AA> a MAY, seems overly complicated. Certain individuals seem to think that the FTSC is an enforcement body, with the power to ban non-compliant software or compel changes. It is not, and most likely never will be. All it can do is document what currently is being used, with an eye toward future implementations (if any) being compatible with current software. The fact is, FidoNet Policy only requires the ability to send and receive mail using an FTS-0001 session over a POTS connection during the designated Zone Mail Hour. Any additional capabilities are a bonus, not a requirement. Back when Internet Only nodes were first proposed, there were some who fought against them being included in the nodelist, as they technically do not comply with the requirement to accept inbound FTS-0001 sessions on a POTS connection. Now it's virtually impossible to get a real copper phone (POTS) line in most areas. Virtually all phone providers these days are selling some sort of VoIP product, which may or may not work properly with a traditional modem. Andrew --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20240209 * Origin: Phoenix BBS * phoenix.bnbbbs.net (618:100/2) |
||||||
|
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Friendly Debate (18+ please) <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
![]() Execution Time: 0.0213 seconds If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster. VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2025 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved. Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf. |