AT2k Design BBS Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages!

You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges.

Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Friendly Debate (18+ please)  <--  <--- Return to Home Page
   Networked Database  Friendly Debate (18+ please)   [1990 / 1996] RSS
 From   To   Subject   Date/Time 
Message   digimaus    All   "Law of the Jungle" or "China Is Running Scared   March 12, 2025
 4:22 PM *  

From: https://shorturl.at/wDAFw (thegatewaypundit.com)

===
    Chinese Foreign Minister: Trump is "Reverting to the Law of the Jungle"

                  by Assistant Editor Mar. 9, 2025 8:40 pm

   China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi blasted American President Donald J.
   Trump by inference when answering a question about the Trump tariffs,
   which are overhauling the US-China $300 billion trade imbalance.

   The Trump Administration has imposed a 10% tariff on Chinese goods.

   The U.S. exported $143.5 billion worth of goods to China in 2024, while
   importing $438.9 billion worth of goods from China.

   Experts generally cite several negative economic outcomes that can result
   from a persistent trade imbalance, particularly a trade deficit (where a
   country imports more than it exports). The eight main concerns experts
   express about persistent trade imbalances include:

    1. Currency Depreciation & Inflation
    2. Job Losses in Domestic Industries
    3. Increased Debt & Foreign Ownership
    4. Industrial Decline & Hollowing Out
    5. Economic Volatility & Dependency
    6. Weakened National Security
    7. Structural Unemployment & Wage Stagnation
    8. Interest Rate & Monetary Policy Constraints

   Instead of these rational concerns being a motivation for Trump's actions,
   the Chinese Foreign Minister has reverted to name-calling and suggesting
   that Trump is a tariff madman.

   "There are more than 190 countries in the world," the Chinese diplomat
   said at a news conference in Beijing, the nation's capital city. "Should
   everyone stress `my country first' and obsess over a position of strength,
   the law of the jungle would reign again, smaller and weaker countries
   would bear the brunt first, and international norms and order would take a
   body blow," he added.

   Yet China has historically used tariffs to advance both its political and
   economic agenda.

   China's use of tariffs is calculated and often tied to its broader
   economic and geopolitical strategy, helping it maintain an advantage in
   global trade while protecting domestic interests. For example, in 2020,
   China imposed an 80.5% tariff on Australian barley, crippling the
   country's barley exports in retaliation for Australia's call for a
   COVID-19 origins investigation.

   Similarly, in 2018, China levied 25% tariffs on U.S. soybeans, severely
   impacting American farmers, as part of its response to Trump-era trade
   policies. Another instance occurred in 2021, when China raised tariffs on
   Lithuanian goods after Lithuania strengthened diplomatic ties with Taiwan,
   using economic pressure to discourage other nations from challenging
   Beijing's "One China" policy.

   China is regularly accused of abusing its position of power in Asia, with
   long-running conflicts with India, Bhutan, Taiwan, Japan, Vietnam, and
   countries in the South China Sea. The Chinese are wantonly violating
   international law and claiming the Spratly Islands, for example, because
   of their potential to have oil reserves and their strategic placement in
   shipping lanes.

   China has historically also had past border disputes with Kazakhstan,
   Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Mongolia, Myanmar/Burma, Nepal, North Korea, Pakistan,
   Russia, and Tajikistan, nearly every single one of its neighbors.

   CNN further quoted Yi as adding, "No country should fantasize that it can
   suppress China on the one hand and develop good relations with China on
   the other."

   "This `two-faced' approach is not only not conducive to the stability of
   bilateral relations, but also unable to establish mutual trust."

   One way the Chinese use two-faced diplomacy globally, is through its use
   of international loans and finance to put developing nations in great
   deals of debt.

   The Chinese policy of extending high-interest or strategically leveraged
   loans to developing nations is commonly referred to as "Debt-Trap
   Diplomacy." This term is often used to describe how China provides
   large-scale infrastructure loans to developing countries-primarily through
   the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)-that can lead to unsustainable debt
   burdens. When nations struggle to repay, China can gain strategic
   leverage, such as control over key infrastructure (e.g., ports, railways,
   and energy assets).

   Yi continued, "A big country should honor its international obligations
   and fulfill its due responsibilities. It should not put selfish interests
   before principles, still less should it wield the power to bully the
   weak," Wang said, adding China "resolutely opposes power politics and
   hegemony."

   One prominent example of China's recent selfishness related to the Belt
   and Road Initiative is Sri Lanka's Hambantota Port, where unsustainable
   Chinese loans forced the country to lease the port to China for 99 years,
   effectively ceding a critical asset to Beijing.

   Similarly, under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), Pakistan has
   taken on massive Chinese debt for infrastructure projects that
   disproportionately benefit Chinese companies, raising concerns about
   long-term economic dependency and strategic leverage.

   In Africa, nations such as Djibouti and Kenya have also been cited as
   being financially bullied by Beijing; Djibouti has accrued substantial
   debt financing key infrastructure, while Kenya's Standard Gauge Railway
   project has sparked debates about high costs and questionable returns,
   potentially compromising national sovereignty. These cases exemplify how
   the Belt and Road Initiative can lead to scenarios where borrowing
   countries face significant strategic and economic constraints.

   The Communist Chinese government enjoyed good relations with the
   administration of Joe Biden and his degenerate criminal son, Hunter Biden.
   The Biden family were the recipients of major trade deals with the Chinese
   government. The U.S. House Oversight Committee claims the Chinese were
   laundering money to the Bidens. The Chinese were paying for access to the
   Biden Influence Machine, giving over $8 million to the Biden family.

   According to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), China is the main
   provider of illegal fentanyl and other derivative compounds into the
   United States. An estimated 70% of the 100,000 who die in America each
   year from overdoses do so from Fentanyl. For context, this is roughly
   twice the number of people who die from automobile accidents every year,
   and approximately 49,000 die each year from suicide.

   China produces fentanyl primarily through its vast and loosely regulated
   pharmaceutical and chemical industries, which manufacture both legal and
   illicit synthetic opioids. Chinese companies legally produce precursor
   chemicals used in fentanyl synthesis, often exporting them to Mexico,
   where cartels complete the manufacturing process.

   However, many Chinese labs also produce fentanyl directly and ship
   it-sometimes mislabeled as research chemicals or painkillers-through
   international mail, dark web markets, or intermediary countries to evade
   detection.

   While the Chinese government has imposed regulations on fentanyl-class
   substances, enforcement is inconsistent, and many producers exploit legal
   loopholes by slightly altering chemical structures to create unregulated
   analogs that have similar effects. This ability to rapidly adapt and
   circumvent regulations makes China a key global source of fentanyl and its
   precursors, fueling the opioid crisis in the U.S. and beyond.

   The Chinese are also widely suspected of being involved in the 2020
   election fraud, where Eugene Yu of the Konnech company was found giving
   election data to the Communist Chinese by illegally storing the data of at
   least 240,000 election day workers on Chinese servers.

   The Chinese are also some of the world's most heinous human rights
   abusers, which U.S. reports claim is only getting worse with time.

   China was also caught in 2023 operating at least nine illegal `police
   stations' across the United States.

   China is also a country that still practices what Wikipedia refers to as
   "open defecation" or, in other words, pooping in public.

   An estimated 0.1% of the Chinese population openly poops in public.

   The United States has played a longtime role in supporting and financing
   the Communist Chinese due to subversive far-left agendas, which President
   Trump has been ending after 75 years.

   The China Hands-a group of U.S. diplomats, journalists, and scholars
   specializing in Chinese affairs-played a controversial role in the fall of
   China to communism in 1949. Many of them, including John Service, John
   Paton Davies, and Owen Lattimore, were sympathetic to the Chinese
   Communist Party (CCP) or, at the very least, deeply skeptical of Chiang
   Kai-shek and the Nationalist government (Kuomintang, or KMT). Their
   reports and influence in Washington shaped U.S. policy in ways that
   undermined support for the Nationalists, weakening their ability through
   false reports and lies to policymakers, in order to aid the Communist
   takeover.

   During World War II, the China Hands downplayed the Communist Party's
   radical ideology, instead portraying Mao Zedong's forces as agrarian
   reformers with strong popular support. They simultaneously painted Chiang
   Kai-shek's government as corrupt and ineffective, advocating for a
   reduction in U.S. military and financial aid. Their influence led to
   hesitation in Washington when the Nationalists were struggling in the
   Chinese Civil War, leaving them underfunded and undersupplied. Meanwhile,
   Soviet support for the CCP remained strong, tipping the balance in favor
   of the Communists.

   After Mao Zedong's victory in 1949, critics-most notably Senator Joseph
   McCarthy and the China Lobby-accused the China Hands of deliberately
   sabotaging U.S. policy and paving the way for Communist control.
===

-- Sean
    
--- MultiMail/Linux
 * Origin: Outpost BBS * Johnson City, TN (618:618/1)
  Show ANSI Codes | Hide BBCodes | Show Color Codes | Hide Encoding | Hide HTML Tags | Show Routing
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Friendly Debate (18+ please)  <--  <--- Return to Home Page

VADV-PHP
Execution Time: 0.0205 seconds

If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster.
VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2025 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved.
Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf.
v2.1.250224