AT2k Design BBS Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages! You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges. |
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Friendly Debate (18+ please) <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
|
||||||
From | To | Subject | Date/Time | |||
![]() |
Mike Powell | Nick Andre | Re: Canadian Guns and TV |
February 20, 2019 4:47 PM * |
||
-=> Nick Andre wrote to Mike Powell <=- NA> I remember a lonnnng time ago, a new cable station called CNN reported NA> news in a very professional, almost matter-of-fact nonpartisan manner. As do I, and I remember when CNN Headline News channel was just that... the news and no "shows." NA> And from what I remember... all of that professionalism went straight NA> out the freakin' window around the time of the OJ Simpson trial. That is probably about right. NA> It was interesting that shows like Hard Copy and A Current Affair were NA> mocked for their sensationalist approach to news stories (or what is NA> considered to be news-worthy). Then, most news outlets including CNN NA> chose to become them. Compared to what some news outlets are these days, those two shows seem almost non-sensationalist in comparison. NA> I like Fox News for being that "alternative viewpoint" but sometimes NA> they go off the rails with sensationalism and clickbait headlines; or NA> pumping up stories to be more than what they are. I know all the news NA> outlets do it, but really wish Fox News would lead by example by NA> cleaning itself up a bit. I feel like they also go off the rails. PBS Newshour is not conservative, but they usually keep it professional. On occassion, they get a substitute anchor on the show and it feels more like CNN or a commercial network newscast, but they are usually pretty professional. NA> "The Sun" chain of newspapers in Canada could be considered NA> conservative; and plans were in place for them to start their own news NA> channel. The Canadian equivalent of the FCC, the CRTC, of which major NA> liberal media are members, quickly veto'd the decision by stating that NA> "Canada does not need a Fox News North". NA> Unfortunately Canada does not have free speech or choice in news NA> outlets. That is not good. It is almost to that point here also. Mike ... Direct from the Ministry of Silly Walks --- MultiMail * Origin: Possum Lodge South * possumso.fsxnet.nz:7636/SSH:2122 (618:250/10) |
||||||
|
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Friendly Debate (18+ please) <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
![]() Execution Time: 0.0132 seconds If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster. VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2025 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved. Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf. |